Wednesday, November 10, 2010

My Image Manipulation



For this project, we were asked to choose an image that we were to manipulate using photoshop tools. I decided to select an image of Machu Pichu and manipulate it by adding birds flying around, appearing to "invade" Machu Pichu. I chose birds that are not commonly seen in that region of Peru, to make it seem like an eery occurrence. I chose this picture because I personally have back packed to Machu Pichu, and it is truly the most incredible experience that I've had. I did a weeklong trip full of hiking and adventure to Machu Pichu, and the sight of the great ruins is absolutely incredible. Machu Pichu is creviced in the Andes, and waking up at 4am to hike in the dark through the crisp, damp air to the gates of Machu Pichu is an awesome experience. I took many pictures that essential replicate the one that I manipulated, however I decided to use one off the internet because it was clearer and the colors were better. I manipulated the image by adding four different species of birds flying over the ruins. In addition, I altered the colors. I changed the hue and saturation and added shadows to the background because I thought it gave off a more mystical feel. I also lowered the brightness of the image because I think the hovering shadows added an element of uncertainty as the birds swarmed above. Additionally, I believe that the shadows added to the majestic image of Machu Pichu. I believe that the manipulation is not harmful because it is somewhat humorous and purely for entertainment purposes. There is no subliminal or political messages embedded in the image. This relates to the article that I read because the article talked about how the ability to manipulate  images truly alters the way people view a specific topic or image. For example, the way that companies manipulate images of people, and it ultimately makes viewers feel worse about themselves because they feel that the images depict reality and that they have to meet those standards. However, what I took from the article was that people see an image and oftentimes are intrigued and captivated by the presentation. For example, I believe that many people have not seen an image of Machu Pichu, so if the first one they saw was mine, then they'd be confused and unable to distinguish the original. I believe that this ties in with the article because the article focused on how technology has allowed teachers to manipulate images and to captivate their students. This allows them to have the attention of their students because the students are more likely to pay attention if the material is visually exciting. For my image, I believe that people would be captivated by the colors, and the beautiful scenery of Machu Pichu.


 Greenberg, R. "Image Processing for Teaching." Journal of Science Education and Technology 2.3 (1993): 469-80. Print. 

2 comments: